Having recently been appointed to be the Blog Steward due to my qualifying characteristics (“since you’re in charge of house and worship, please remember to update the blog”), I’m here now to revive this place. I apologize for not updating any sooner, since I’m in camp 5/6/7 days in a week and my laptop has recently just broken down. I’m using my youngest sister’s laptop to type this now.

Ah well, with the recent events coming to a closure, that being the Balls of Fury/ Furious Balls, overall it was a pretty good job. Even though in terms of preparations we were a little shakey and loose, the thing went through without much of a show-stopper, even though there were some hiccups but nothing too serious. Kudos to everyone involved for this event and God for holding back the rain and not letting it go all out on us haha.

Anyway like what Daniel Lum mentioned below, CYCLING NEXT SAT. NS BOYS, please remember to UPDATE your passports. I’m pretty I will might forget it as well, so please remind each other. And that’s all I have for now. Tired and tomorrow I have to rush back to camp early to iron and starch my uniform. Gah.

This is gonna be a pretty long post, but please read it all; read it like a book. I’m starting halfway into the chapter. Here goes.

Chapter 5: How can a loving God send people to hell?

• Most people think a God of judgement can’t be a God of love

I Christianity God is both a God of love and of justice. Many people struggle with this. The believe that a loving God can’t be a judging God. Like most other Christian ministers in our society, I have been asked literally thousands of times, “How can a God of love be also a God filled with wrath and anger? I he is loving and perfect, he should forgive and accept everyone. He shouldn’t get angry.” I always star my response by pointing out that all loving people are sometimes filled with wrath, not just despite of but because of their love. If you love a person and you see someone ruining them- even they themselves- you get angry. As Becky Pippert puts it in her book Hope Has Its Reasons:

Think how we feel when we see someone we love ravaged by unwise actions or relationships. Do we respond with benign tolerance as we might toward strangers? Far from it… Anger isn’t the opposite of love. Hate is, and the final form of hate is indifference… God’s wrath is not a cranky explosion, but his settled opposition to the cancer… which is eating out the insides of the human race he loves with his whole being.

The bible says that God’s wrath flows from his love and delight in his creation. He is angry at evil and injustice because it is destroying its peace and integrity.

The Lord is righteous in all his ways and loving toward all he has made…

The Lord watches over those who love him, but all the wicked he will destroy. (Psalms 145:17-20)

It is at this point that many people complain that those who believe in a God of judgement will not approach enemies with a desire to reconcile with them. If you believe in a God who smites evildoers, you may think it is perfectly justified to do some of the smiting yourself. Yale theologian Miroslav Volf, a Croatian who has seen the violence in the Balkans, does not see the doctrine of God’s judgement that way. He writes:

If God were not angry at injustice and deception and did not make a final end to violence – that God would not be worthy of worship… The only means of prohibiting all recourse to violence by ourselves is to insist that violence is legitimate only when ot comes from God…My thesis that the practice of non-violence requires a belief in divine vengeance will be unpopular with many…in the west…[But] it takes the quiet of a suburban home for the birth of the thesis that human non-violence [results from the belief in] God’s refusal to judge. In a sun-scorched land, soaked in the blood of the innocent, it wwill invariably die… [with] other pleasant captivities of the liberal mind.

In this fascinating passage Volf reasons that it is the lack of belief in a God of vengeance that ’secretly nouirishes violence’. The human impulse to make perpetrators of violence pay for their crimes is almost an overwhelming one. It cannot possibly be overcome with platitudes like ‘Now don’t you see that vilence won’t solveanything?’ If you have seen your home burned down and your relatives killed and raped, such talk is laughable- and it shows no real concern for justice. Yet victims of violence are drawn to go far beyond justice into the vengeance that says, ‘You put out one of my eyes, so i ill put out both of yours.’ They are pulled inexorably into an endless cycle of vengeance, of strikes and counterstrikes nurtured and justified by the memory of terrible wrongs.

Can our passion for justice be honoured in a way that does not nurture our desire for blood vengeance? Volf says the best resource for this belief in the concept of God’s divine justice. If i don’t believe that there is a God who will eventually put all things right, I will take up the sword and will be sucked into an endless vortex of retaliation. Only if i am sure that there’s a God who will right all wrongs and settle all accounts perfectly do i have the power to refrain.

Czeslaw Milosz, the nobel-prize winning Polish poet, wrote the remarkable essay ‘The Discreet Charms of Nihilissm’. In it he remembers how Marx had called religion ‘the opiate of the people’ because the promise of afterlife (Marx said) led the poor and the working class to put up with the unjust social conditions. but, Milosz continued:

And now we are witnessing a transformation. A true opium of the people is a belief in nothingness after death- the huge solace of thinking that our betrayals, greed, cowardice, murders are not going to be judged…[but] all religions recognise that our deeds are imperishable.

Many people complain that belief in a God of judgement will lead to a more brutal society. Milosz had personally seen, in both Nazism and Communism, that a loss of belief in a God of judgement can lead to brutality. If we are free to shape life and morals any way we choose without ultimate accountability, it can lead to violence. Volf and Milosz argue that the doctrine of God’s final judgement is a necessary undergirding for human practices of love and peacemaking.

• Most people think a loving God would not allow hell

‘Ah,’ you may say, ‘fighting evil and injustice in the world is one thing, but sending people to hell is another. The bible speaks of eternal punishment. How does that fit with the love of God? I cannot reconcile even the idea of hell with a loving God.’ How do we address this understandable recoiling?

Modern people inevitably think that hell worls like this: God gives us time, but if we haven’t made the right choices by the end of our lives, he casts our souls into hell for all eternity. As the poor souls fall through space, they cry out for mercy, but God says,’ Too late! You had your chance! now you will suffer!’ This caricature misunderstands the very nature of evil. The biblical picture is that sin separates us from the presence of God, which is the source of all joy and indeed of all love, wisdom or good things of any sort. Since we were originally created for God’s immediate presence, only before his face will we thrive, flourish and achieve our highest potential. If we were to lose his presence totally, that would be hell- the loss of our capability for giving or receiving love or joy.

 A common image of hell in the bible is that of fire. Fire disintegrates. Even in this life we can see the kind of soul disontegration that self-centredness craetes. We know how selfishness and self-absorption leads to piercing bitterness, nauseating envy, paralyzing anxiety, paranoid thought and the mental denials and distortions that accompany them. Now we ask the question: ‘What if when we die we dont end, but spiritually our life extends on into eternity?’ Hell, then, is the trajectory of a soul, living a self-absorbed, self-centred life, going on and on forever.

Jesus’ parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man in Luke 16 supports the view of hell we are presenting here. Lazarus is a poor man who begs at the gate of a cruel rich man. They both die and Lazarus goes to heaven while the rich man goes to hell. There he looks up and sees Lazarus in heaven ‘in Abraham’s bosom’:

So he called to him, ‘ Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.’ But Abraham replied, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been fixed, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.’ He answered, ‘then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my father’s house, for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’ Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.’ ‘No, father Abraham,’ he said, ‘but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’ He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophetss, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’ (Luke 16: 24-31)

What is astonishing is that though their statuses have now been reversed, the rich man seems to be blind to what has happened. He still expects Lazarus to be his servant and treats him as his water boy. He does not ask to get out of hell, yet strongly implies that God never gave him and his family enough information about the afterlife. Commentators have noted the astonishing amount of denial, blame-shifting and spiritual blindness in this soul in hell. They have also noted that the rich man, unlike Lazarus, is never given a personal name. He is only called a ‘Rich Man’, strongly hinting that since he had built his identity on his wealth rather than on God, once he lost his wealth he lost any sense of a self.

In short, hell is sim ply one’s freely chosen identity apart from God on a trajectory into infinity. We see this process’writ small’ in addiction to drugs, alcohol, gambling and pornography. First, there is disintegration, because as time goes on you need more and more of the sddictive substance to get an equal kick, which leads to less andless satisfaction. Second, there is the isolation, as increasingly you blame others and circumstances in order to justify your behaviour. ‘No one understands! Everyone is against me!’ is muttered in greater and greater self-pity and self-absorption. When we build our lives on anything but God, that thing- though a good thing- becomes an enslaving addiction, something we have to have to be happy. Personal disintegration happens on a broader scale. In eternity, this disintegration goes on forever. There is increasing isolation, denial, delusion and self-absorption. When you lose all humility you are out of touch with reality. No one ever asks to leave hell. The very idea of heaven seems to them a sham.

in his fantasy The Great Divorce,C.S. Lewis describes a busload of people from hell who come to the outskirts of heaven. There they are urgesd to leave behind the sins that have trapped them in hell- but they refuse. Lewis’s description of these people are striking because we recognise in them the self-delusion and self-absorption that are ‘writ small’ in our own addictions.

Hell begins with a grumbling mood, always complaining, always blaming others… but you are still distinct from it. You may even critisise it in yourself and wish you could stop it. But there may come a day when you can no longer. Then there will be no you left to critisise the mood or even enjoy it, but just the graumble itself, going on forever like a machine. It is not a question of God ’sending us’ to hell. In each of us there is domething growing, which will BE Hell unless it is nipped in the bud.

The people in hell are miserable, but Lewis shows us why. We see raging like unchecked flames their pride, their paranoia, their self-pity, their certainty that everyone else is wrong, that everyone else is an idiot! All their humility is gone, and thus so is their sanity. They are utterly, finally locked in a prison of their own self-centredness, and their pride progressively expands into a bigger mushroom cloud. They continue to go to piece forever, blaming everyone but themselves. Hell is that, writ large.

That is why it is a travesty to picture God casting people into a pit who are crying ‘I’m sorry! Let me out!’ The people on the bus from hell in Lewis’s parable would rather have their ‘freedom’, as they define it, than salvation. Their delusion is that, if they glorified God, they would somehow lose power and freedom, but in a supreme and tragic irony, their choice has ruined their own potential for greatness. Hell is, as Lewis says, ‘the greatest monument to human freedom’. As Romans 1:24 says, God ‘gave them up to … their desires’. All God does in the end with people is give them what they most want, including freedom from himself. What could be more fair than that? Lewis writes:

There are only two kinds of people- those who say to God, ‘Thy will be done’  to God or those to whom God in the end says, ‘ Thy will be done.’ All that are in Hell choose it. Without that self-choice it wouldnt be Hell. No soul that seriously and constantly desires joy will ever miss it.

Hello, I’m here to blog. Although its a rather inappropriate time (I’m in the office), I’ve got a little spare time so thought i should drop a post. (:

Everyday, I take bus 107 to work, and during that time frame CNA is showing on TVMobile. Day after day I watch the morning news, and I realise how fortunate and sheltered we are, here in Singapore. It also dawns upon me that we are all, in my coined term, prayer bozos.

Prayer bozos are christians like you and me, who go about their daily lives, watch the news on earthquakes and disasters, and walk away humming our own little tune. We’ve become so prayer apathetic, because we’re safe in our little bubble. Sad to say, I think I’m very much guilty of this. Sad to say, when I watched news on the Tsunami and China earthquakes I did not feel burdened to pray for them. Sad to say, I dismissed much of the news as daily information feed. Sad to say, I’m a prayer bozo.

We lead very comfortable lives, yes we do. I don’t believe anyone of us has suffered extreme hunger, thirst, or had no roof over our heads to call home. The most extreme situations I can think of that could happen to us is forest bashing, combat rations (for the dudes), blackouts, and no water heater. Perhaps due to our cushy lives, we’ve forgotten how to be burdened, we’ve forgotten how to truly pray.

Prayer builds foundation to much of our faith. But sometimes, we become self-centered in our prayers, choosing to focus on what WE want God to do for us, at times enlarging the prayer circle a bit more to include interceding for pre-believing friends and family. But how many of us pray for people beyond our shores? Even people we don’t know?

Sometimes I wonder if my little prayer can do anything for the people recovering from the China earthquake, or for the people trapped in the China mines due to flooding. (Read today’s news) Much of that wondering for me usually results in a lot of thinking, but no action. I think its all about mindset.  We really need to move beyond our comfort zones, and open our eyes to what is happening in the world. There is much to be burdened for. God does the changes, we pray.

Let’s be challenged to be christians with a worldview. Let’s be challenged to grab ourselves out from prayer apathy. Let’s not be prayer bozos! You can start now! Watching CNA and reading Straits Times gives you plenty of things to pray for.

okay, back to work, have a good day peeps. Long post, long long post. Haha.

-Chrystal

hey guys, guess who’s here?

justin wooooo! haha i’m glad you guys so warmly receive me into your cg, and though i’m not exactly integrated into being part of this cg yet, i hope this addition (me hurhur) would become permanent, eventually. and well it seems like many people still don’t know who i am, and vice versa. is this blog for ALL cgs or just this cg (you get what i mean haha)? oh anyways, when lum told me about you guys having a blog i was kinda amazed and cool-ified (oh well). it’s sort of a great place and avenue for exchanging and sharing of ideas and thoughts regarding issues we all face in life at this age.

by the way, i was just thinking we could start something called the ‘Food For Thought’ (or FFT), comprising articles or thoughts of our own we want to or can share to others within, and possibly also outside, the cg. I believe this can construct a form of sharing which can be encouraging and enlightening at the same time. any responses to this idea?

so maybe we could take our sharing to a deeper level, and i apologise if this post sounds so self centred with ‘i’s perpetually being littered all over the previous paragraphs.

anyway, i could start with one. i got this from a friend’s blog and i think it allows us to re-evaluate our perception of ‘Your Will Be Done’ when we pray. anyways, here goes:

—

Gethsemane

Then Jesus went with his disciples to a place called Gethsemane, and he said to them, “Sit here while I go over there and pray.” He took Peter and the two sons of Zebedee along with him, and he began to be sorrowful and troubled. Then he said to them, “My soul is overwhelmed with sorrow to the point of death. Stay here and keep watch with me.”

Going a little farther, he fell with his face to the ground and prayed, “My Father, if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me. Yet not as I will, but as you will.”

Then he returned to his disciples and found them sleeping. “Could you men not keep watch with me for one hour?” he asked Peter. “Watch and pray so that you will not fall into temptation. The spirit is willing, but the body is weak.”

He went away a second time and prayed, “My Father, if it is not possible for this cup to be taken away unless I drink it, may your will be done.”

When he came back, he again found them sleeping, because their eyes were heavy. So he left them and went away once more and prayed the third time, saying the same thing.

- Matt 26:36 – 44

We often place lots of value on what we want. Whatever it is, we want it done our way. We have learnt to request in such a way that ‘if it is God’s will it will be granted’. But how often do we mean it? When we have prayed in that way, and not received what we asked for, we still feel disappointed and angry that we did not have our way.

But what Jesus showed in his life was submission. His faith prevailed over his senses. When he prayed “My Father, if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me. Yet not as I will, but as you will.”, he meant it. And by meaning what he said in his prayer, he was submitting himself to God’s will, obedient to death, even death on a cross.

—

‘Your Will Be Done’.

the intention and meaning of this quadruplet of words can be undermined many times, so i guess it’s rather important to understand the difference of ‘i want what i want at the end of the day’, and ‘what God wants’.

this actually brings to mind how prayers are being made before we consume meals. do we really embrace the spirits of thanksgiving and sincerity when we say, “Lord, I thank You for the food,’ or do we just make such statements for the sake of saying it, yet being relatively ignorant towards bearing such an attitude?

i think it’s important to keep our attitudes in check, be it in the carnal or spritual aspect. it is not uncommon that people think they feel what they feel and they’re so sure of it, yet hidden somewhere in the subconscious is the question, ‘is it really as i feel and think?’